Cool Solutions

Linux vs. Windows TCO


March 16, 2007 9:56 am





There have been a couple of stories out in the media, and a slashdot posting, critical of Novell for “assenting” to language in our joint press release with Microsoft on HSBC indicating that Windows TCO is lower than Linux TCO. To suggest we “assent” to this idea is completely misleading. Novell has always maintained that Linux is a lower cost platform than Windows. I sat in on several press interviews (here’s one)  that Matthew O’Neill of HSBC gave about the announcement. As he explained it, HSBC did a benchmark assessment of their internal IT environment. In the course of that assessment, they concluded it was costing them more to run their varied Linux environment than their Windows environment. Their Linux environment included many different builds (some 50 or so) of different Linux distributions. That created challenges in terms of systems management, application compatibility, life cycle management, etc. This was costing them money. By standardizing on SUSE Linux Enterprise Server, they expect to lower the TCO of their Linux environment.

This isn’t a blanket statement that Windows TCO is cheaper than Linux TCO. Novell wouldn’t associate itself with a statement like that.

0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5 (0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.

Categories: Expert Views, General, PR Blog


Disclaimer: This content is not supported by Micro Focus. It was contributed by a community member and is published "as is." It seems to have worked for at least one person, and might work for you. But please be sure to test it thoroughly before using it in a production environment.


  1. From: La nueva crisis de identidad en Novell :