Cool Solutions

Does endpoint management need to change?


February 8, 2011 5:45 pm





In most IT environments today, users are assigned their own endpoint, whether mobile or tethered to the corporate LAN, and this endpoint contains an Operating System, a set of embedded applications and a wealth of personal data concerning the user, the applications they run and how they run them. Moving this to a new platform is typically a cumbersome task and not one to be taken lightly and almost certainly requires an enterprise-grade endpoint management tool to get it right. In large organizations, I’ve seen endpoint rollouts that have taken over 2 years and therefore by the end of the rollout, the next rollout project is already underway and the original Standard Operating Environment is a distant fading memory. Endpoint delivery in some cases has been equivalent to painting the Forth Bridge, a never-ending task.

So can this change? Can endpoint delivery become truly fluid and dynamic?

Today, organizations across the globe are seriously considering the viability of desktop virtualization technologies as a means of achieving this goal through simplifying the management and delivery of end-user workspaces. Desktop virtualization technologies encompass many disciplines including Server-hosted VDI, locally hosted virtual desktops and application virtualization, each approach the delivery of resources to the end-user in a slightly different way. There is no single answer for managing the end-user experience in all of these scenarios, but what is constant is the need for ongoing management. Delivering a desktop session is the first of many steps towards fulfilling the requirements of an end-user, whether the session is hosted on a virtual or physical device.

Endpoint management itself is also an umbrella term covering many disciplines including security, remote management, software delivery, asset management, policy-enforced automation, patch management and so on. During my time in the IT industry, the disciplines used to deliver endpoint management have not changed a great deal.

Does moving the endpoint to a virtual world really change the management paradigm? If so, what do these changes mean for your organization?

1 vote, average: 4.00 out of 51 vote, average: 4.00 out of 51 vote, average: 4.00 out of 51 vote, average: 4.00 out of 51 vote, average: 4.00 out of 5 (1 votes, average: 4.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.

Categories: Expert Views, Unified Endpoint Management


Disclaimer: This content is not supported by Micro Focus. It was contributed by a community member and is published "as is." It seems to have worked for at least one person, and might work for you. But please be sure to test it thoroughly before using it in a production environment.


  1. By:rbartsch

    I look forward to read how IT leaders will respond.