Cool Solutions

Looking for feedback on future ZENworks requirement

jblackett

By:

April 23, 2018 10:49 pm

Reads:800

Comments:4

Score:Unrated

Print/PDF

As you are all aware, back in the ZENworks 2017 timeframe we were considering moving to an Appliance-only model for the ZENworks Primary Server. The intent of this was to optimize the number of platforms that needed to be tested and improve the overall stability of the system. Based on your feedback at the time, and your pre-11.4 appliance experience, we decided not to do this — choosing instead to ensure that we provided a robust appliance experience while continuing to support Windows and Linux. Since then we’ve had some great feedback about the new appliance.

As we move forward we have identified a set of capabilities we need to add related to status reporting, inventory in a large system and trend reporting that requires the use of a different kind of database that can hold and report on massive amounts of data much faster than RDBMS databases can today. To do this we are investigating the ability to use our newly acquired Vertica database platform.

One of the challenges with Vertica is that it is only supported on the Linux platform. Based on this we are considering having the next version of ZENworks (codename “Atlantic”) provide a ZENworks Appliance that has Vertica and a few other Linux only services included in it. If you want to take advantage of the large data changes or trending enhancements it would require the deployment of this updated ZENworks Appliance either as a replacement for your current Primary Server or as an additional Primary in the zone. Without at least one appliance deployed within the environment, your functionality would be limited because of this requirement.

I’m looking for your feedback now based on your appliance experience as to if there are any concerns with this requirement in ZENworks “Atlantic”. What concerns do you have about this approach? Feel free to comment on the thread or drop us an email directly at zen@microfocus.com

0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5 (0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading...

Tags:
Categories: ZENworks, ZENworks Asset Management, ZENworks Configuration Management, ZENworks Endpoint Security Management, ZENworks Full Disk Encryption, ZENworks Patch Management, ZENworks Suite

4

Disclaimer: This content is not supported by Micro Focus. It was contributed by a community member and is published "as is." It seems to have worked for at least one person, and might work for you. But please be sure to test it thoroughly before using it in a production environment.

4 Comments

  1. By:Thomas

    Appliance only? OK, but think about KVM!

    In my expirience the most appliances from Nov^wMicro Focus are running in KVM well when converted. But there is no support for this. We need the ability to use the appliance on more then the both main HV (VMware, HyperV)
    KVM is the best solution and you have the know how in our own house.

    • Appliance only is ok for us, but also support it on Citrix XENserver.

      Also, for appliances in general, please provide an easy way for backup (like configuring daily database dumps in the web portal) and if needed, an easy way of installing additional rpms for the backup agent as needed and still be supported.

  2. By:BMcDowell

    As described to me by Oscar, an additional appliance to hold the Vertica database, running in parallel to the rest of the ZENworks environment – whether appliances or not – seems reasonable to support the UI goals that require the additional data handling.

  3. By:mattjones

    I don’t mind appliance only. In many ways it would make life easier. We’ve got to have a physical to appliance migration tool though.

Comment

RSS